سلطة الادارة في تقييد الملكية الفردية للمصلحة العامة: دراسة مقارنة

الموضوعات

قانون

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

0c4f008b-86ab-4d9f-8826-52ab4e6f3ac5

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

2153879_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

The authority of the administration to restrict individual ownership for the public interest

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"حامد فارس شبلي","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"علي نجيب حمزة","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

سلطة الادارة في تقييد الملكية الفردية للمصلحة العامة: دراسة مقارنة

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

The widest scope of the rights in rem is the right of ownership, rather the sum of other rights in rem derives from it. Whoever has the right of ownership over something has the right to use it, the right to exploit it, and the right to dispose of it, and thus gathers all the powers that the law gives to the person over the thing. However, there is a long controversy between the man-made doctrines about the nature of the right of ownership since the early sixteenth century until the present day, and this dispute was summarized in two doctrines and two situations in the world, one of which is known as individual gold and the other as the collective doctrine, the first giving priority to the individual and the other giving it to the group.On the political, economic and social level, and both directions go with the intervention of the state to impose restrictions that limit the powers of the owner to achieve the public interest. Undoubtedly, the legal restrictions on individual property are many restrictions that are difficult to enumerate all of them, especially since the legislator and the management authorities have the ability to decide new restrictions whenever the interest calls. Public The restriction of the right to individual ownership for the public interest appears in various restrictions, including legal requirements such as expropriation for the public benefit and nationalization, which is the most extreme stage of this restriction and restrictions for criminal reasons or restrictions on the owner’s powers such as limiting agricultural ownership to a maximum and reducing the owner’s powers in exploitation.On the one who imposes some special restrictions, even if they are forced, if the owners do not accept to agree to those restrictions, are these restrictions imposed unconditionally? A union and for free. This calls us to look for guarantees, and there is no doubt that the judiciary is one of the most important sources that work to preserve the right of individual property and the rights that branch from it, as protection is not limited to a specific type of property without others, space with all its constitutional and administrative levels. The ordinary has for a long time been a protector of individual property against all aggressions.

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

علي نجيب حمزة

الإعداد

حامد فارس شبلي

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية