مجازر الثامن ماي 1945 في الكتابات التاريخية الجزائرية و الكتابات الفرنسية من خلال شهادة و كتابات أحمد محساس
أحمد دركوش, رقية مويسي, زينب قوادري, علية بن رشيد
كلية العلوم الاجتماعية والإنسانية-جامعة زيان عاشور - الجلفة · الجزائر
The massacres of May 08, 1945 AD are one of the topics that drew a lot of ink and gained the interests of writers and historians in the contemporary history of Algeria. Struggle and watch over awareness of the masses and prepare them for the hour of decisiveness and the arrogant colonial administration that refuses to recognize its right to self-determination, which was in response to the Algerians’ demands for repression, persecution and neglect at times and with false promises and frivolous reform at other times. During our next study of this topic, we reached the results :* From the French occupation of Algeria until independence, the historical student seeks the interrelationship between events and the interaction between generations. The war had its negatives, but it also had its positives, especially in spreading the liberating spirit among the weak peoples, and the best example of this is the bloody massacres of May 08, 1945 AD, which confirmed Everything that was taken by force can be recovered by force.* The events of the eighth of May did not come to a nap, but rather a historical sequence imposed by successive events and the inevitability of the conditions of war and new national awareness. that.* The crimes and massacres of May 08, 1945 AD are an international crime committed by the colonial authorities against a people defenseless from arms, which claimed the lives of more than 45 thousand Algerians, and the French government deliberately used force and violence to destroy this movement.* The massacres of May 08, 1945 AD, a history written by France with the blood of the martyrs and a disgrace on its face and the face of its criminals against innocent and defenseless, children, elderly and helpless women.* The great difference in the narration of events between the colonial and local view, as the Algerians held France responsible, while the French writings on this incident were confused, unfair and contradictory, and characterized by a kind of subjectivity, and they held the responsibility for what happened in the first place to the Algerian People’s Party. At the end of our treatment of this subject, we learned the brutality of French colonialism against the Algerians, by studying Ahmed Mahsas' book.