الرؤية الامريكية للدور التركي في الشرق الاوسط بين النظرية والتطبيق 2001-2015

الموضوعات

سياسة

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

fe3a6eea-0be7-41ad-9d40-e8c241506687

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1697062_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

American vision towards the Turkish role in the Middle East Theory and Practice 2001-2015

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"حمودة محمد خليل الحوساني","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"ياسر أبو دية","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

الرؤية الامريكية للدور التركي في الشرق الاوسط بين النظرية والتطبيق 2001-2015

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

This study seeks to analyze the American vision towards the Turkish role in the Middle East,and the compatibility of this on reality in order to understand the fact of the roles of theUnited States and Turkey in the fundamental issues in the region, such as the Arab Israelipeace process, and the issue of war against terrorism, as well as the revolutions that has sweptthe world such what is known in the term “the Arab Spring”. Furthermore, the Study seeks toanalyze the reasons of assemblage and the reasons of difference in the stances of bothcountries with highlighting the future of the Turkish role in the region and its compatibilitywith the American vision, and the extent of the association of this to the existence of justiceand development party in the Governance of Erdogan. The study also concentrates on thehistory and nature of the American relations in the Middle East in general, and the TurkishAmerican relations in particular, as well as introducing the history and nature of the ArabAmerican relations to the reality of the Turkish stance towards the Palestinian Cause.The study is aimed at analyzing the stance of the United states of America and Turkeytowards the popular revolutions in the countries of Arab moderate axis in order to fulfill thepurposes and objectives of the American stance which seemed different, but rather,contradictory towards these revolutions and protests that has broken out in the countries ofthe Arab moderate axis. These revolutions have raised the same demands and requests,providing that these revolutions have happened in countries that are friendly to the UnitedStates in the Arab Region, classified with the countries of the Arab moderate axis.The limits of the study extended to include the region of the Middle East as a whole.However, the time limits of the study is restricted in the time period 2001-2015. The mainquestion is “how did the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union as well as the events of 11th of September, in addition to the resulted changes in the American politicstowards the region which remained firm throughout the centuries after the Second WorldWar, influenced the role of Turkey and its strategic significance in the region?Moreover, the Study has proposed the following sub-questions: how did the Americanstrategy developed in the Middle East before and after the Cold War and the events of 11th ofSeptember? How did the Turkish strategy developed in the Middle East before and after theCold War and the events of 11th of September? What is the role of America and Turkey in theArab Israeli Peace process? What is the fact behind the Turkish and American stancestowards the issue of anti-terrorism? And what is the stance of America and Turkey towardsthe popular revolutions?In an attempt to answer these questions, the study has highlighted several hypotheses, mostimportantly: the hypothesis that says: “although the end of the cold war, and the collapse ofthe Soviet Union has made changes in the American Politics towards the region which hasremained firm throughout the centuries after the Second World War, which has reached itspeak after the event of 11th of September, Turkey has confirmed that its strategic significancehas not ended by the end of this war, which has been the spearhead in fighting the SovietUnion, but rather, this significance has increased and developed”, in addition to the followingsub-hypotheses:1. The end of the Cold War and the event of 11th of September has caused change in theAmerican and Turkish strategies in the Middle East.2. The alignment of America with Israel has led to the stagnation of peace process interms of the Palestinian course.3. There is a relation between the background of the Justice Party and the IslamicDevelopment and the absence of the Israeli trust as an intermediate in the peaceprocess.4. The difference in the American and Turkish view of points in terms of the regionissues has led to the difference in the concepts of anti-terrorism.5. The role of America and the role of turkey in the events of “the Arab Spring” havemet sometimes and conflicted other times.The study is divided into four chapters. First chapter is a background on the study, the secondchapter revolved around the theoretical framework using a detailed theoretical study and thischapter has also highlighted the importance of the Middle East Region for United state andTurkey. Then the third chapter highlighted the American strategy in the Middle East beforeand after the Cold War, and the events of the 11th of September, in conjunction with a studyto the American and Turkish relations and Turkish strategy in these time periods. The Fourthand final chapter has highlighted the research that was carried out to the roles of America andTurkey in the Israeli Arab peace process, and the stand point of other countries towards theissue of terrorism as well as the views of America and Turkey towards “the Arab Spring”.

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

ياسر أبو دية

الإعداد

حمودة محمد خليل الحوساني

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية