THE U.S. ROLE IN CONFLICT RESOLUTIONA CASE STUDY OF THECAMP DAVID SUMMITS OF 1979 AND 2000

الموضوعات

سياسة

الملخص

This thesis is a comparative case study of Camp David (1979) and Camp David (2000), with afocus on the U.S. role as the main broker between Israel and Arabs. The study aims tounderstand what actually went wrong in the Camp David Summit of 2000, and it reveals thereal factors behind such failure. It explains the reasons behind the different outcome of bothsummits, even though both were held under the patronage of the U.S. as the main mediator.The objective of this research is to examine how the Palestinians can build a betterrelationship with the U.S. and how they can learn more about how the United States works, inorder to influence U.S. policy, so that it takes better account of the Palestinian perspective andPalestinian needs. Such a change in U.S. policy is necessary for Palestinians to gain trust inthe United States as a mediator in the conflict and perhaps, at a later stage, as an arbiter, too.This study briefly discusses the main interest groups in the United States and their role in thecreation of American policies that support Israel at the cost of the Palestinians. The studyanalyzes the nature of the U.S.-Israel relationship in comparison with the U.S.-Palestinianrelationship. It also discusses the use of U.S. foreign financial aid policy as an instrument inresolving conflicts, and it discusses mediation as a commonly used approach in conflictresolution.The role of mediation has rapidly developed over the last four decades and has become a toolof increasing importance to resolve conflicts. The study analyzes the role of mediation inresolving disputes and explores whether mediation is sufficient for resolving complicated andvery controversial cases, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Resolving such a conflictperhaps needs to shift at a later stage from mediation to arbitration. Palestinians and Israelisneed outside help to overcome the conflict between them. The United States has the mostpotential as the mediator and as an arbiter. The study concludes that the U.S. has not acted as aprofessional and fair mediator, which has caused the Palestinians to feel that there is anabsence of neutrality practiced by the U.S. Therefore, the chances of succeeding in brokering afinal, just, and comprehensive peace agreement are very slim. The conclusion recommends that Palestinians need to alter their approach to the United States in order to strengthen andimprove relations; and ultimately moderate the role of the U.S. as a mediator in order to reacha just and permanent solution to the conflict with Israel.

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

f47e984e-f01f-4ebf-a4a7-39a2be31e882

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1695934_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

دور الولايات المتحدة في حل النزاع دراسة حالة من مؤتمرا ت كامب ديفيد لعامي 1979 و 2000

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"خضر عبداللطيف محمد ابوعليا","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"محمد الدجاني","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

English

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

THE U.S. ROLE IN CONFLICT RESOLUTIONA CASE STUDY OF THECAMP DAVID SUMMITS OF 1979 AND 2000

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

محمد الدجاني

الإعداد

خضر عبداللطيف محمد ابوعليا

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية