رسائل ماجيستير
العربية
2025
f2b7bafd-6c73-4be4-8a18-d4533efb951f
الاتفاق على الإثبات: دراسة مقارنة
Agreement on Proof: comparative study
أحمد علي مهدي عباس, حسين عبيد شعواط, عقيل سرحان محمد الغزي
كلية القانون-جامعة القادسية · العراق
الموضوعات
قانون
روابط وملفات
التعريف والنوع
- رقم الوثيقة
- f2b7bafd-6c73-4be4-8a18-d4533efb951f
- رقم العقد
- 0
- نوع الوسائط
- Crawler
- نوع المحتوى
- الرسائل العلمية
- صيغة المصدر
- رسائل ماجيستير
- نوع الملف
- pdf text
- أسماء الملفات
- 854470_1.pdf
بيانات النشر
- ترجمة العنوان
- Agreement on Proof: comparative study
- ألقاب المؤلفين
- [{"name_ar":"أحمد علي مهدي عباس","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"حسين عبيد شعواط","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"عقيل سرحان محمد الغزي","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]
- اللغة
- Arabic
المصدر والدورية
- اسم المصدر
- الاتفاق على الإثبات: دراسة مقارنة
المحتوى والصفحات
- عدد الصفحات
- 0
- ترجمة الملخص
- An agreement on proof is a form of procedural agreement concluded between parties to regulate the means or methods of proving rights and obligations in legal disputes. It does not concern the creation or termination of a right, but rather regulates the means of proof, whether by expanding, restricting, or modifying the order of these means. This agreement is a direct application of the principle of the sovereignty of the will in procedural matters, albeit within limits that do not violate public order or the principle of equality between adversaries. For this agreement to be valid, it must meet the general elements of a contract, including capacity, consent, subject matter, and a legitimate cause. It is also required that the agreement not violate mandatory rules related to public order, such as rules regarding means of proof, which may not be altered by agreement. The subject of the agreement must be clear and must not violate the principles of equality or justice. Furthermore, the will must be free from defects of consent, such as coercion or gross fraud. The effect of an agreement on proof is limited to its parties only and is not valid against third parties unless they accept it or it is legally declared. The scope of the agreement also varies depending on whether it precedes or coincides with the dispute. Rules relating to evidence in criminal or personal status matters are exempt from the scope of application if they are mandatory. However, in civil and commercial disputes, agreements on evidence are widely accepted unless they prejudice the public interest. The assessment of this agreement is subject to judicial oversight, and it is not considered conclusive or final if it is flawed. A judge is not bound by an agreement if he believes its implementation may lead to a denial of justice or harm to one of the parties. The judge has discretionary power to accept or reject the agreement, especially if it includes arbitrariness, a violation of public order, or an unlawful restriction of the right to defense. This agreement may expire in several ways, including the implementation of its subject matter and the end of the dispute, a new agreement that cancels or amends the original agreement, or the expiration of the agreed-upon term. It also expires if one of the parties breaches its obligations, or if the agreement loses its legal function due to a change in circumstances or the issuance of new legislation prohibiting a certain type of agreement on evidence. If one party breaches the agreement on proof, their civil liability arises. This liability is contractual in nature, as it results from the breach of a concluded agreement. To establish liability, the following elements must be present: fault, damage, and a causal relationship. Fault manifests itself in ignoring the agreed-upon means of proof or presenting evidence excluded by the agreement. Compensation is awarded to the party harmed by the breach, whether the damage is material, such as loss incurred due to a delay in resolving the case, or moral, such as damage to their reputation or legal standing. Compensation is subject to judicial discretion based on the seriousness of the breach and the extent of its impact on the course of the dispute or its outcome. Compensation is not automatically awarded; it must be claimed and the damage proven.
- كلمات الباحثين
- اتفاق الإثبات – وسائل الإثبات – حقوق والتزامات – النظام العام – مبدأ المساواة – صحة الرضا – الطعن على العقد – المسؤولية العقدية – التعويض – الرقابة القضائية – الإلغاء أو التعديل – انتهاء الاتفاق – الضرر المادي والمعنوي
إشراف وإعداد
- الإشراف
- حسين عبيد شعواط, عقيل سرحان محمد الغزي
- الإعداد
- أحمد علي مهدي عباس
الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية
APA
أحمد علي مهدي عباس،حسين عبيد شعواط و عقيل سرحان محمد الغزي. (2025). الاتفاق على الإثبات: دراسة مقارنة . أطروحة(رسائل ماجيستير). كلية القانون-جامعة القادسية. العراق.
MLA
أحمد علي مهدي عباس،حسين عبيد شعواط و عقيل سرحان محمد الغزي. الاتفاق على الإثبات: دراسة مقارنة . 2025. كلية القانون-جامعة القادسية، رسائل ماجيستير.