نظرية الحجاج ومستويات الخطاب اللسانية في النثر العربي القديم التوحيدي نموذجاً

الموضوعات

ادب

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

f029e863-54d0-4004-92d2-e62e3d319d3d

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل دكتوراة

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1957449_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

The Argumentation Theory and the Linguistic Levels of Discourse in Ancient Arabic Prose: Al-Tawhidi Model

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":" ابتسام محمد محفوض","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"رضوان القضماني","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

نظرية الحجاج ومستويات الخطاب اللسانية في النثر العربي القديم التوحيدي نموذجاً

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

This research aims to study the argumentation in Abi Hayyan Al-Tawhidid’s literature through his two works: Al-Imta’ Wa Al-Muanasa (Pleasure and Affability) and Al-Muqabasat (The Citations). It also analyzes Al-Tawhidi’s Argumentation styles in these two works. Therefore, we adopt a clear-cut plan in order to reach out the required results. The research consists of two independent chapters. Each chapter involves integrated sections. The first chapter consists of five sections, and it starts with a prelude about the definition of argumentation and the concepts related to it. Argumentation is defined in terms of language and terminology. We also explain how scholars in the West contributed to the various definitions of argumentation. Thereafter, we discuss the concept of argumentation according to ancient Greeks, and how it relatesto rhetoric and sophism, in addition to what Platodid to criticize the sophists approach in many of his dialogues with his instructor Socrates, and what Aristotleadded after him. Later we deal with the School of Alexandria which represented an independent intellectual and philosophical movement that influenced the features of human thought in both Middle and Modern Ages. We also discuss its impacts on the knowledge of the Arabs and how Al-Tawhidi read the Greek philosophy through the Arab translations available at the time. Afterwards, we discuss (The Impressions of Argumentation in Arab Heritage) showing the concept of argumentation in Arabic dictionaries, and how Arabs had their own style of argumentation which demonstrates the distinction of their Islamic culture and how it differs from the Western argumentation heritage. We also specify the differences between Arabs rhetoric and the Aristotelian one as well as the stature of the Holy Quran as a unique, distinct and miraculous argumentation discourse. Next, we study some Arab critics and rhetoricians, such as Al-Jahiz, Ibn Wahab, Hazim Al-Qartajinni and Jalal Al-Din Al-Suyuti. The First Section studies the argumentation structure showing its motives, domain, function, conditions, forms and ends. We identify the role of the argumentat or as a thinker and a visionary who tries to make the vision comes true. However, we also shed light on the importance of the recipient as an effective part in the process of argumentation without whom there is no chance for argumentation to take place.

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

رضوان القضماني

الإعداد

ابتسام محمد محفوض

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية