اختصاصات النيابة العسكرية في الدعوى الجزائية قبل المحاكمة في ضوء التشريعات الفلسطينية وقانون أصول المحاكمات الثوري لعام 1979 دراسة مقارنة

الموضوعات

قانون

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

eddacf02-d074-4b4e-a497-890f53489a14

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1695553_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

Jurisdiction of Military Prosecution in the criminal case Before trial According to the Revolutionary Procedural Law Of 1979 And Comparative Legislation

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"رفيق أبو عياش","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"محمد سعيد عبد الرحمن ابوعلي","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

اختصاصات النيابة العسكرية في الدعوى الجزائية قبل المحاكمة في ضوء التشريعات الفلسطينية وقانون أصول المحاكمات الثوري لعام 1979 دراسة مقارنة

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

This studythat is composed of 200 pages, introduces new ideas and topics fit to be separate researches themselves, in particular, the topic of “the completion of the terms of reference of the role of the prosecution in the criminal case” and “linking the proceduraldimension to the objective one”, and other topics that worth to have independent titles to be themselves independent researches.The study also explains the role of military prosecution in following up on the crimes from the procedural basis from the moment of the crime until the end of the initial investigation and then the referral to the court and the supervision, considering that the military prosecution is a fundamental part of the court.The study defines the meaning the “disciplinary crime” and theauthority of the military commander to take actions with regard to the disciplinary crimes and the restrictions on it, unlike the public prosecution which has no restrictions on the exercise of it competences in case of ratification by the attorney general.As the study also explained the points that characterize the procedural basis of the Palestinian military prosecution and their application, compared to the Egyptian military prosecution, such as the strict adherence to the international standards and legislations, despite the interdependence and interrelation between them, and the need of the Palestinian legal reality for a legislation that is in line with the reality of the new Palestinian military judiciary and justice establishments.Despite the evolution of the system of general laws in their civil framework, it did not specify the special laws in military affair, that the overlap and conflict of jurisdiction between the civil and military courts has not yet been resolved despite the passage of more than 15 years between the separation of the two jurisdictions, and despite that the military judiciary focused all its efforts and powers in the military issue only. ‌ٔMilitary offences are subject to the “objective” and “procedural” legitimacies, the chapters of the study dealt with the Palestinian "procedural legitimacy" with analysis, evaluation and comparison with the ancient Egyptian experience. The study also identified the degree of symmetry, contrast, and contradiction in the course of this proceduralsystem and its nature and examination and the extent of their procedural legitimacy.Finally, the study concluded that the establishment of a regular and modern military system in the legal sense requires the subordination of this system to the law and judiciary, and emphasizing the importance and necessity of providing substantive and procedural legislation and adherence to its rescue and application. This is a practical step and a reform of the military justice sector, which puts an end to improvisation and diligence and responds to constitutional provisions and international and national standards

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

رفيق أبو عياش

الإعداد

محمد سعيد عبد الرحمن ابوعلي

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية