تقييم فعالية جهاز الوخز الآلي بالمقارنة مع جهاز الليزر المجزأ فى تحسين مظهر الندب الوجههية المعيبة: دراسة سريرية مقارنة

الموضوعات

طب

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

0fab59e9-f8d1-440e-99bf-3ebaddf43bb7

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1960083_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

Evaluation of Efficiency of Automated Microneedling Device versus Fractional Laser in Defective Facial Scars Improvement: Clinical Comparative Study

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"محمد حسان جعفو","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"نسيم غازي بيطار","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

تقييم فعالية جهاز الوخز الآلي بالمقارنة مع جهاز الليزر المجزأ فى تحسين مظهر الندب الوجههية المعيبة: دراسة سريرية مقارنة

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

140

ترجمة الملخص

Background: Scars are a common phenomenon as they develop after skin injury in patients of all ages. Although most scars do not pose a health risk, they can be highly disfiguring, resulting in decreased quality of life Aim of the study: the aim of this work is to assess the efficacy and safety of automated micro needling for the treatment of surgical and post-traumatic scars in comparison with fractional Co2 Laser. Materials and methods: The study evaluated 28 scars from 11 patients aged between 18 and 49. One-half of the scars (chosen at random) were treated using Automated Micro needling technology and the other half were treated with fractional Co2 Laser. In each case, three treatment sessions were given at 21-days intervals, in addition to a final 6-month evaluation session. Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment scale V2.0 (POSAS), each scar has been evaluated from the patient’ scale in terms of pain, itchiness, skin color, hardness, thickness, shape and the overall state of the abnormal facial scar. The same abnormal facial scars have been evaluated by three different observers in terms of vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, pliability, surface area and the overall state of scars using the POSAS Observer’ scale at four distinct stages. Clinical evaluation of the results were performed .Results: Concerning the use of Automated Micro needling, the findings of this study reveal statistical differences at significance level of 5% between each session. This indicates a reduction in the scale values of the studied variables. In addition, the mean clinical improvement was similar between the two techniques, and there was no statistical differences at significance level of 5%.Conclusion: we concluded that Automated Microneedling is safe and efficient and leads to a similar results in the improvement of the characteristics of the scars after comparison with Fractional Co2 Laser

كلمات الباحثين

atrophic scar, Automated microneedling, fractional lase, hypertrophic scar, matrix metalloproteinase, الليزر المجزأ, الندبة الضخامية, الندبة الضمورية, الوخز المجهري الآلي, قالب البروتيناز المعدني

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

محمد حسان جعفو

الإعداد

نسيم غازي بيطار

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية