تحليل الخطاب القرآني في ضوء مناهج التفسير - التفسير الكبير أنموذجا-

الموضوعات

علوم اللغة

الملخص

The correlation between the text and the interpretation is adjustedaccording to two major paradigms: the former is reflected by a trust thatlanguage is no more than a representation of the writer’s spirit and the spirit ofthe time. The latter is that there is a certain fusion between the text and thewriter, the writer and the reader, and the pieces of the text itself so as all of thetext, the writer and the reader, become prospects for a single image.It is worth mentioning that the human being in fact moves in an infinite orbitof interpretations, and not in an orbit of signs which internal and externalsubsistence could be close to some interpretation’s transactions, and it is inreality assessments for the mind’s part in what it perceives as signs varyingaccording to the different occasions and contexts, something that givespotential to this statement to end the disagreement around the dichotomy ofText/ Interpretation to make both parts of the dichotomy two faces of thesame coin, for the reason that there is no text to be interpreted but there is aninterpretation to be reinterpreted.Thus, methodology and the real world seem to be in contradiction in manycontexts, each wants to control the other on the level of definition ordescription, a matter that makes the majority of interpreters pay closerattention to the case of dichotomy gathering such propositions, that they aredichotomies which do fit to go with the nature of the speech act, on theprinciple that the speaker sees the interaction from a double single angle. Aslong as he knows perfectly that his existentialist and cognitive judgments areconnected to the receiver’s horizon in shape and content, and that is whatmakes communication a give and take; both speaker and hearer need eachother.It is an effort to unravel the problem posed already in the past in the form ofa reflection we think it is capable to take a generous share to embark in, andadopt this rationale, what pushed us to call it as it fellows: Coranic Discourse inthe light of interpretation methods» The Greatest Interpretative Sample”To understand the problematic of explanation and interpretation in theIslamic heritage, one should make the difference between two readingsexperiments for the coranic discourse represented by two generations ofinterpreters; the first of them was satisfied with the single meaning of twoterms and treated them on the basis of synonymy. However, the secondgeneration put the terms apart according to the text and the opinion. Thus, in aquest for meaning, the interpretation of Coran (7th verse of Aal Omraan) hadbeen the precursor for a renewal of paradigms of interpretation.Indeed Fakhr Arrazi’s readings obey different methods and practicalmanipulations, all of which based on the rationalist proof. His work, consciousof its limitations related to his impotency next to the perfect and absoluteCoran, he refers to reason as the efficient tool and the measure to guaranteeand serve the truth. He exploited the Arabic heritage with its various culturesand philosophies and framed an important background on which theinterpretation of the coranic text could benefit extensively.

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

0bf7014d-a5ac-4e1c-9662-6b11a963a5a3

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل دكتوراة

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

215522_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"لزعر مختار","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"مفلاح بن عبد الله","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

تحليل الخطاب القرآني في ضوء مناهج التفسير - التفسير الكبير أنموذجا-

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

341

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

لزعر مختار

الإعداد

مفلاح بن عبد الله

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية