أثر الحركة الاحتجاجية في إسرائيل 2011-2012

الموضوعات

سياسة

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

0a5576a8-cf10-4233-a6ac-f52ea8a01f96

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1695946_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

The effects of the protest movement in Israel 2011-2012

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"أوري ديفيس","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"محمود فخري نمر حسونة","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

أثر الحركة الاحتجاجية في إسرائيل 2011-2012

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

The subject of the research subject deals with the importance of the mass 2011-2012 socialprotest movement in the streets and squares of Israel's cities, its timing, its situation and itseffect. The protests started with the demand for social justice after the Israeli successivegovernments neglected the social services as a result of the neo-liberal and economicpolicy.The research aimed at identifying the Israeli social protests during 2011-2012 and theextent of success for these protests.The researcher used the qualitative analytical method and the content analysis researchtools applied mainly on Hebrew resources.The research aimed at answering the following:How did the Israeli public response to the protests movement?The extent of the participation of political parties in the protests movement.How did the Israeli government react and face those protests?The research provides the reader with an insight into the social movement in Israel and itseffect dividing it into chapters and subjects. The study included five chapters. Each chapterwas divided into a number of inter-related subjects that draw a rounded view of the protestmovement in Israel.The research includes the study of the background, the theoretical frame, idioms, and thefactors that led to the protests in the squares. In addition, it views the effect of the protestsmovement on the parliamentary elections, the security dimension, the extent of responsethat was adopted by the Israeli governments and finally it reviews the developments thatemerged from the social protests.The research came to conclusion that the Zionist political dimension played big role inpreventing the protest leaders from contact and building bridges in regard to the mutualdemands with the Palestinian in Israel such as cost of living, taxes and housing. Knessetmember Itzik Shmuli (one of the social protest leaders who later joined the Labor party)said that the Palestinian who live in Israel would not participate in the protests unless theyraise national emblems and under the umbrella of the national struggle which is refused bythe Zionist protesters.Moreover, the research suggests that the protests leaders weren’t interested in buildingbridges of trust with the Palestinian or with the leaders of the "Arab Spring". Thus, ItzikShmuli, one of the leaders of the protest movement in Israel, responding to a questionnaire,did not accept that the movement was affected by the revolutions of the "Arab Spring". Inthe opinion of the researcher, Shmuli's response reflects the absence of the bridges of trustas a result of the political dimension and Zionist racism. On the other hand, the Israeliprotest movement leaders discovered that it was not the cost of “cottage” cheese nor thecost of living and housing which hinder achieving their demands, but rather thegovernment and its security budget of which the Israeli citizen paid in favor of occupationand settlement through the direct and the indirect taxes which left negative impact on thesocial services.It is evidently clear that the 2011-2012 social protest movement in Israel impacted thesubsequent 2013 elections, with Yair Lapid adopting the protesters demands, capitalizingon the corrosion of the middle class, whose vote gained him 19 seats in the 19th Knesset.Lapid and his Party (Yesh 'Atid) lost much voters and seats when they disappointed andturned their back to the protesters’ demands, and so, he gained 11 seats in the subsequent2015 elections for the 20th Knesset. Consequently, there was a negative view towardspolitical parties as a whole which created mistrust of the public. In Dr Aziz Haydar's viewthe negative attitude towards parties came to the surface because the contact channelsbetween the public and their representatives was lost. To conclude, the Israeli socialprotests wouldn’t fulfill recovery in the social welfare unless Israel discards the occupationpractices.

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

أوري ديفيس

الإعداد

محمود فخري نمر حسونة

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية