Do arbitrators have a duty to report corruption?Maybe . . . Maybe Not

الموضوعات

قانون

الملخص

This paper explores whether arbitrators’ have a duty to report corruption or not. It is divided into two parts. In part one, the paper presents the legal status of arbitrators by introducing the contractual, judicial and hybrid theories. Also, it examines the national laws of the US, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia to establish whether there is a legal duty to report or not. In the second part, the paper defines both confidentiality and public policy, and shows where the conflict between the two exists. On the one hand, arbitrators have a duty to protect confidentiality. On the other hand, arbitrators have a duty to insure the award will be enforced and that the contract does not contradict public policy. With this in mind, the paper will present five cases where the competent governments knew about the corruption, yet they did not prosecute the perpetrators. The paper concludes with the contention that arbitrators have no legal duty to report corruption.

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

09ba4b1f-92c4-4c04-80a6-1cf108cbf600

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

word

أسماء الملفات

09ba4b1f-92c4-4c04-80a6-1cf108cbf600_1.docx

بيانات النشر

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"Hani Sayed","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"Hussain Alobaidi","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

English

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

Do arbitrators have a duty to report corruption?Maybe . . . Maybe Not

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

Hani Sayed

الإعداد

Hussain Alobaidi

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية