المسؤولية الإدارية القائمة على فكرة المخاطر: دراسة مقارنة

الموضوعات

قانون

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

word

أسماء الملفات

09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_1.doc, 09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_2.doc, 09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_3.doc, 09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_4.doc, 09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_5.doc, 09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_6.doc, 09134781-56c6-4657-8454-36d97c504158_7.docx

بيانات النشر

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"عمار طعمة حاتم البيضاني","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"غازي فيصل مهدي","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

المسؤولية الإدارية القائمة على فكرة المخاطر: دراسة مقارنة

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

When the French Council of State (Conseil d'Etat) practiced its exceptional role through the efforts exerted to settle the administrative law rules in general, and the administrative responsibility field in specific, it has a great impact towards the independency of the administrative responsibility from its equal the civil responsibility. Hence, the council put the pillars of this theory as being the supplementary base of the administrative responsibility beside the error in addition to the council wish to find a kind of equilibrium between the administration privileges and the individuals' rights towards these privileges. This type of responsibility is based on two corners only: harm and the causative relationship between it and the hazardous administration activity. The administration can not deny the responsibility off it unless by proving the compelling power and the sudden accident. Despite the success achieved by the French experiment, especially in the field of responsibility on the basis of hazards, the legislative and judicial attitude towards such responsibility is characterized with hesitation, especially the judicial, as the Egyptian Court of Administrative Judiciary applied the responsibility notion without an error in certain cases, then it did not take long before it retreated from its situation. As to the situation of the Iraqi legislation and judiciary, the legislator was bolder by issuing several legislations taking the content of hazards notion, yet searching this theory in the Iraq judiciary finds no application whatsoever for reasons, like non-giving the administrative judiciary the general power to try the administrative disputes that happen between the administration and the individuals, where several such disputes stay as the specialty of the court of administrative judiciary, and non-changing or canceling the judiciary specialties given to the administrative committees. We are in need for a legislative treatment through which our judiciary is capable to try these disputes by finding some equilibrium between the individuals' rights and the privileges of the general authority (the administration). Hence, this treatment is in the necessity of fixing the specialty of administrative judiciary in trying the administrative disputes totally and canceling the judicial specialties given by the administrative committees in the constitution, accordingly we can have and find judiciary despite its establishment for a long time, yet its specialty remained confined to try defected administrative decisions.

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

غازي فيصل مهدي

الإعداد

عمار طعمة حاتم البيضاني

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية