Schoobrary رجوع
العودة إلى البحث
رسائل ماجيستير الانجليزية 2016 083b8ac2-e4e9-405c-ab75-f428c2356059

Comparison of Abdominal Clinical Diagnosis Findings and CT Findings in Khartoum state CT Centers

مقارنة نتائج التشخيص السريري للبطن مع نتائج تشخيص الأشعة المقطعية بمراكز الأشعة المقطعية ولاية الخرطوم

ضحى عبده محمد, هديل ضرار محمد

كلية الدراسات العليا-جامعة السودان للعلوم والتكنولوجيا · السودان

الموضوعات

طب

الملخص

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning has revolutionized patient care in the past two decades. Abdominal CT scanning is used in the evaluation of trauma victims for visceral injury and in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain, with a major role in the evaluation of renal calculi, acute appendicitis, and complex abdominal pathology. The Study was performed in Khartoum state hospitals. The purpose of this study was to compare the abdominal clinical findings and CT diagnosis findings. Abdominal CT scans were taken in 150 patients with abdominal problem. 100 patients with general abdominal scan, 50 patients with urinary system pathology for CTU. 70 patients with general abdominal scan were correctly diagnosed (46.7%), 33 patients were misdiagnosed (22%) and 47 patients presented with another pathology (31.3%) as presented in table (4-3). 43 patients with GIT or liver pathology were correctly diagnosed (43%), 25 patients were misdiagnosed (25%) and 32 patients presented with another pathology (32%) as presented in table (4-4). 27 patients with urinary system pathology were correctly diagnosed (54%), 8 patients were misdiagnosed (16%) and 15 patients presented with another pathology (30%) as presented in table (4-5). 40 patients were clinically diagnosed with mass lesions (38.8%), 25 patients with stones (24.3%) and 38 patients with other pathology (36.9%) as presented in table (4-6). 80% of mass lesions were correctly diagnosed, 72% of stones were correctly diagnosed and 52.6% of the other pathologies were correctly diagnosed. The study concludes that CT imaging in the diagnosing patients presenting with acute abdominal pain is well established. The usefulness is limited by certain factors: the absence of detailed clinical history, the variability in the interpretation of non-specific image findings. Awareness of these limiting factors is vital to clinicians, radiologists and radiology technologists in the diagnosis and treatment of patients.

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة
083b8ac2-e4e9-405c-ab75-f428c2356059
رقم العقد
0
نوع الوسائط
Crawler
نوع المحتوى
الرسائل العلمية
صيغة المصدر
رسائل ماجيستير
نوع الملف
pdf text
أسماء الملفات
21447_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان
مقارنة نتائج التشخيص السريري للبطن مع نتائج تشخيص الأشعة المقطعية بمراكز الأشعة المقطعية ولاية الخرطوم
ألقاب المؤلفين
[{"name_ar":"ضحى عبده محمد","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"هديل ضرار محمد","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]
اللغة
English

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر
Comparison of Abdominal Clinical Diagnosis Findings and CT Findings in Khartoum state CT Centers

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات
0

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف
ضحى عبده محمد
الإعداد
هديل ضرار محمد

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية

APA

ضحى عبده محمد و هديل ضرار محمد. (2016). Comparison of Abdominal Clinical Diagnosis Findings and CT Findings in Khartoum state CT Centers. أطروحة(رسائل ماجيستير). كلية الدراسات العليا-جامعة السودان للعلوم والتكنولوجيا. السودان.

MLA

ضحى عبده محمد و هديل ضرار محمد. Comparison of Abdominal Clinical Diagnosis Findings and CT Findings in Khartoum state CT Centers. 2016. كلية الدراسات العليا-جامعة السودان للعلوم والتكنولوجيا، رسائل ماجيستير.