العلاقات المتبادلة بين المقاومة والدولة (حماس وحزب الله : دراسة مقارنة)

الموضوعات

سياسة

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

04474b67-a9bc-44d0-b06f-f0e156b95479

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

60507_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

The Interrelationship between the Resistance and the "State" : A Comparative Study of Hamas and Hizboullah

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":" محمود علي عبدالحميد جرابعة","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"جورج جقمان","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"سمير عوض ","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"هيلغي باومغرتن","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

العلاقات المتبادلة بين المقاومة والدولة (حماس وحزب الله : دراسة مقارنة)

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

This study tackles the issue of resistance and its relation to the 'state' with concentration on Hezbollah and Hamas' experience. Theoretically, according to Max Weber, the state has the absolute authority over all means of resistance. What gives each state its sovereignty and independent entity is the right to use legal power through extending its power and authority. The state's monopoly over resistance means is not a marginal, a substantive requirement for every state. Resistance against any state requires response by the state. However, what this study tackles is 'resistance army' or resistance against occupier. It is worth mentioning that the resistance army keeps back from the struggles for authority. This study hypotheses that the weaknesses and inability of every state to function leads the institutions within this state to bridge the gap, however, the actions of these institutions do not necessarily meet the state's agenda. I see that the resistance never becomes strong, unless there is a need for functions, which the resistance does on behalf of the state. Also, these resistance movements are usually socially supported. It is clear that these functions and roles are related to resist the Zionist plans in Lebanon and Palestine. It is رworth mentioning that the fragility of the 'state' correlates with resistance power and ability to face all challenges. It is undoubtedly that the inability of each single state to secure its land and people drives new generations of rebellious and radical youth to bridge this gap. It is well known that the traditional military establishments in all Arab states are not able to face the "Israeli" military in a traditional war. Hence, Arab states in general and Palestine and Lebanon in specific as states "protected by its military" is exposed to Israeli leverage. The last war on Lebanon shows the existence of deterrent power with modern- old tools: war of developed and modern guerrilla warfare. So, the problem is the weakness of the state (Arab states) against Israel. Armed resistance within the state is a problem that can not be solved unless state's nature is changed not only in Lebanon and Palestine since resistance movements are not the cause of state's crisis but results. In this context, Arab societies will stick out such type of resistance movements unless states are considered real states with independent and strong entities

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

جورج جقمان, سمير عوض , هيلغي باومغرتن

الإعداد

محمود علي عبدالحميد جرابعة

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية