Adversarial or inquisitorial: which approach is closer to arbitration?

الموضوعات

قانون

الملخص

Adversarial techniques such as pre-trial discovery of documents, cross-examination, and lengthy oral pleadings are now in vogue in the conduct of international commercial arbitration proceedings. This paper responds to this trend by analyzing both the adversarial and the inquisitorial systems in an attempt to demonstrate which is more fulfilling to the objectives of international commercial arbitration. These objectives are party autonomy, neutrality, efficiency, flexibility, and confidentiality. In the finale, the paper provides that although the adversarial system is in line with the autonomy rights of those who opt for arbitration, its inquisitorial counterpart is more neutral, efficient, flexible, and confidential. It argues, furthermore, that since arbitration is in essence a mechanism that comes at the expense of parties' rights in favor of the efficiency and the flexibility of the arbitral process, the inquisitorial system is more proximate to the objectives of international arbitration and, therefore, more realizing to the aspirations of its customers.

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

029131c0-3339-45c9-8136-59fc51fef915

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf image

أسماء الملفات

029131c0-3339-45c9-8136-59fc51fef915_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"Ahmed Zaki","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"Amr Shalakany","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

English

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

Adversarial or inquisitorial: which approach is closer to arbitration?

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

Amr Shalakany

الإعداد

Ahmed Zaki

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية