تفسير القانون الأجنبي: دراسة مقارنة

الموضوعات

قانون

الملخص

بعد اطلاعنا على المصادر التي ترتبط بتفسير القانون الأجنبي ، وابان البحث في ما ورد في بطون تلك المصادر ، تمكنا بفضل الله من اكمال مقدمة الرسالة ومتنها المكون من ثلاث فصول ، والأن نصل لخاتمة الرسالة ، والتي تتكون من استنتاجاتنا عن موضوع تفسير القانون الأجنبي ، ومن المأَخذ التي لحظناها على النظام القانوني العراقي وبقية الأنظمة القانونية العربية والأجنبية ، الناجمة عن قصورها في معالجة موضوع تفسير القانون الاجنبي ، وأخيراً من مقترحاتنا التي نرى أن يؤخذ بها في النظام القانوني العراقي وبقية الأنظمة القانونية العربية والأجنبية ، لمعالجة قصورها إزاء موضوع تفسير القانون الاجنبي ، لذلك نتطرق أولاً للاستنتاجات ومن ثمَّ المأَخذ وأخيراً نتطرق للمقترحات

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

01bb7cf9-5e2b-4656-a9bb-b606dc4b228c

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1002504_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

Interpretation of the Foreign Law: comparative study

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"حسنين ضياء نوري الموسوي","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"},{"name_ar":"علي زعلان نعمة العبادي","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

تفسير القانون الأجنبي: دراسة مقارنة

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

interpretation of The Foreign Law, is one of the most important subject, according to the private international law, specially the conflict of laws. Because the interpretation of The Foreign Law, helps the national (local)judge, reaching to the judgment of the foreign law. So as to apply it to a dispute having foreign element, and finally settles down this dispute. Consequently, we can’t solve the dispute, unless we get the interpretation of The Foreign Law. From this point ,we can obviously see the importance of this subject. We have devoted, the first chapter of this thesis, to the matter of the national judge must be followed, the interpretative style prevailing in the foreign country, in the Interpretation of the Foreign Law, not the interpretative style prevailing in the country of the national judge. Because that harmonizes with the aim of the national legislator, in rule of chose (regles de rattachement),which refers to the application of the foreign law .And that harmonizes with the interests of the opponents ,who expected the foreign law applied to the dispute .We have noticed, that most of the jurisprudence, and the legal systems in world, followed this solution. We have devoted, the second chapter of this thesis, to the matter of the burden of proving of the Interpretation of the Foreign Law, lies on the national judge ,not on the opponents. Because , the Interpretation of the Foreign Law, is considered question (matter) of law not question (matter) of fact, which must be evaluated only by the judge. We have seen ,that majority of the jurisprudence ,and the legal systems in the world, adopted this solution. And we have noticed, that unanimously of the jurisprudence ,and the legal systems in the world, admitted the principle of the freedom of the proof, for the national judge, that is to say, the national judge, has the freedom to go back to any means, which has been agreed upon to be used, in proving the content of foreign law, to come up with the Interpretation of the Foreign Law. We have devoted, the third chapter of this thesis, to the matter of the national judge, when referring the foreign legal system, reaching the Interpretation of the Foreign Law ,he may facing difficulties ,whose source is, the foreign legal system alone, or whose source is, the foreign legal system, and the national legal system, As well ,we have also explained, the solutions of each of these difficulties. Finally we have devoted, the third chapter of this thesis, to the matter of the national judge, may be unable to reach, the Interpretation of the Foreign Law. And we have noticed, that there are four theories, put to face this problem. these are :the theory of Rejecting The Demand ;the theory of General Principles of Law ;the theory of (Lex–Fori); the theory of the Nearest Law To The Foreign Law .We have seen, that most of the jurisprudence ,and the legal systems in the world, adopted the theory of (Lex-Fori), to face such problem. for this reason ,we have taken The Interpretation of the Foreign Law, by exposing its general principles, and how to deal with the problems ,that may arouse from it .And we have taken ,in our consideration ,the situation of the jurisprudence ,and the legal systems in the world ,about this subject, specially the situation ,of the Iraqi jurisprudence, and the Iraqi legal system

كلمات الباحثين

القانون الأجنبي - الأنظمة القانونية - المبادئ العامة للقانون الأجنبي

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

علي زعلان نعمة العبادي

الإعداد

حسنين ضياء نوري الموسوي

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية