جريمة التقصير أو الامتناع عن القيام بالواجب في القانون الليبي والمقارن: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

الموضوعات

قانون

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

00fdcb09-8195-4632-98e3-7dc538ae0ab3

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

2327920_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

The crime of default or refraining from doing the duty in Libyan and comparative law: Comparative Analytical Study

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"سالم محمد الأوجلي","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"فائزة موسى عبدالباري موسى","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

جريمة التقصير أو الامتناع عن القيام بالواجب في القانون الليبي والمقارن: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

This study aims to identify the crime of default or refraining from doing the duty in Libyan and comparative law, which harms others and threatens their human lives and stability, and to know the common provisions of this crime both in the Libyan Penal Code and Law No. 2 of 1979 on economic crimes, In order to give a clear picture of the offenses of abstract abstinence and abstinence-related offenses, and we talked about the problems posed by this study, the most important are the elements of this crime are the pillars of the underlying positive crime or that there is a difference between them, and to what extent is the responsibility of a public official who commits an offense of default on the basis of an order issued by his boss or on the basis of an error in his assessment of the facts, the scope of the study was limited to the crime committed by the public official, and in order to answer this problem, follow the analytical and comparative approach, where we discussed through the study of the subject of the crime of default or refraining to indicate the images of the employee's default or refraining to do the duty, and we talked about the absence of the responsibility of the employee for default or refraining to do the duty may be this excuse justified and can not be blamed on him and therefore the exemption from liability may be in his belief in the legitimacy of the act, or to carry out the order of the Chief Duty to obey him, or the default or refraining is driven by external power, human or natural. -2-At the end of this letter, we spoke about the results that we have reached through this humble research, which clearly explains the crime of default or refraining, and we have recommended that there be clear provisions, especially abstentions, and therefore we call for limiting these texts and placing them in the section devoted to the crimes committed by the staff against the public administration for easy reference

كلمات الباحثين

جريمة التقصير - القانون الليبي - السلوك الإجرامي

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

سالم محمد الأوجلي

الإعداد

فائزة موسى عبدالباري موسى

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية