النظرية السياسية بين الواقعية والمثالية

الموضوعات

فلسفة

روابط وملفات

التعريف والنوع

رقم الوثيقة

00393d03-0578-4152-8d49-38ca573811e5

رقم العقد

0

نوع الوسائط

Crawler

نوع المحتوى

الرسائل العلمية

صيغة المصدر

رسائل ماجيستير

نوع الملف

pdf text

أسماء الملفات

1697129_1.pdf

بيانات النشر

ترجمة العنوان

Tmfae freaeenanfeses fe seiroeh: realism and Idealism

ألقاب المؤلفين

[{"name_ar":"سري نسيبة","title_ar":"اشراف","title_en":"Supervision"},{"name_ar":"عدي هاشم سليمان زيدات","title_ar":"اعداد","title_en":"Preparation"}]

اللغة

Arabic

المصدر والدورية

اسم المصدر

النظرية السياسية بين الواقعية والمثالية

المحتوى والصفحات

عدد الصفحات

0

ترجمة الملخص

Following the death of the prophet the issue of his succession in early Islamic history came to assume critical importance. Stated briefly, the major question that came to be addressed was the following: Should the prophet’s successor (and the umma’s ruler) assume both the religious and political functions formerly carried out by the prophet –be both an imām as well as a khalīfa? To a large extent this issue still bears on the major divide in the contemporary Muslim world between sunnīs and shīʿites Based on early as well as later secondary sources I set out in this thesis the relevant historical background to this question as well as the different arguments that formed the frame of debate over it. In doing this I try to show that what later became ideological differences between different Muslim parties simply began as a political competition over power. One of the first signs for this was the lateruse by the different parties of two major events -the shūrā or consultation that took place on the eve of the prophet’s death at al-saqīfaover who to succeed him, as well as a ḥadīth by the prophet at al-ghadīr that was assumed by Ali’s supporters to identify him as successor. Eventually, these two incidentscame to typify two positions –sunnī and shīʿite-over the process of identifying the Muslim ruler My thesis then elaborates on the different arguments presented by the different sides for their respective positions –why an imām combining political and religious functions is necessary, or why a khalīfa with a political function is sufficient-and ends with a comprehensive summary by the qāḍī ʿAbd al-Jabbār of the arguments for the necessity or otherwise of an imām (in the shīʿite) sense Since my thesis highlights the issue of authority of the Muslim community as seen in terms of purely religious arguments, I have also included a chapter where a different lens is used by two early intellectual figures, Ibn Khaldūn and Ibn Taymiyyah, where actual authorityis argued to arise and be sustained due to power (might, tribal solidarity, etc.). As I show, while these two authors do not ignore the religious arguments, they nonetheless emphasize a certain political ‘realism’ in their theories Throughout, I have made sure to alert the reader to the different meanings attributed to the terms “imām” and “khalīfa”, their scriptural and etymological origins. A clear understanding of how these terms were understood by the different interlocutors provides the student with a clearer picture of the differences between them.ز

إشراف وإعداد

الإشراف

سري نسيبة

الإعداد

عدي هاشم سليمان زيدات

الاقتباسات الببليوغرافية